A
Culture of Violence
A
country that glorifies wars and violence in the name of peace
by
Stephen Lendman
Global Research
What do you call a country that glorifies wars and violence
in the name of peace. One that's been at war every year in
its history against one or more adversaries. It has the
highest homicide rate of all western nations and a passion
for owning guns, yet the two seem oddly unconnected. Violent
films are some of its most popular, and similar video games
crowd out the simpler, more innocent street play of
generations earlier. Prescription and illicit drug use is out
of control as well when tobacco, alcohol and other legal ones
are included.
It get's worse. It's society is called a "rape culture" with
data showing:
-- one-fourth of its adult women victims of forcible rape
sometime in their lives, often by someone they know,
including family members;
-- one-third of them are victims of sexual abuse by a husband
or boyfriend;
-- 30% of people in the country say they know a woman who's
been physically abused by her husband or boyfriend in the
past year;
-- one in four of its women report being sexually molested in
childhood, usually repeatedly over extended periods by a
family member or other close relative;
-- its women overall experience extreme levels of violence;
an astonishing 75% of them are victims of some form of it in
their lifetimes;
--domestic violence is their leading cause of injury and
second leading cause of death;
-- statistically, homes are their most dangerous place if men
are in them as millions experience battering by husbands,
male partners or fathers;
-- for most women with children, there's no escape for lack
of means and because male assailants pursue them causing
greater harm;
-- adding further injury, its society is often unsupportive;
it affords women second class status, privileges and redress
when they're abused so many suffer in silence fearing coming
forward may cause more harm than help;
-- its children are abused as well; millions suffer serious
neglect, physical mistreatment and/or sexual abuse; many get
relief only through escape to dangerous streets; they end up
alone, more vulnerable and at greater danger away than at
home where there, too, families act more like strangers or
predators forcing young kids to flee in the first place.
What country is it where things like these are normal and
commonplace; where peace, tranquility and safety are
illusions; where they're crowded out by foreign wars and
violence at home in communities, neighborhoods, schools,
throughout the media and in core families. What kind of
country glorifies mass killing, assaults and abuse; one that
looks down on pacifist non-violence as sissy or unpatriotic,
yet claims to be peace loving. It's not in the third world,
under dictatorship or controlled by religious extremists.
It's the "land of the free and home of the brave, America the
Beautiful" where human rights, civil liberties, common
dignity and personal safety are more illusion than fact. More
on this below.
War As "the Ultimate Economic Shock Therapy"
Mahdi Nazemroaya writes in his August 29 "War and the 'New
World Order' " article on Global Research.ca that war is "the
ultimate (and most effective) economic shock therapy (that
can) change societies and reshape nations," and that America
today is embarked on achieving a long-standing vision for
"global ascendancy" and supremacy. For the Trilateral
Commission of "powerful" US, EU and Japanese "elites," its
operative 1973 founding goal was a "New International
Economic Order." For George HW Bush it became the "New World
Order," and for GW Bush a permanent state of war for global
hegemony.
Nazemroaya writes America's "foreign policy is based on
economic interests" with military might used to enforce them.
He states various US administrations have pursued "An
(unbroken) agenda of perpetual warfare and violence (for)
global domination through economic means." George Bush's
current "war on terrorism" in the Middle East and Central
Asia are just "stepping stones" toward that "global order"
unipolar Pax Americana vision under which no nation is
exempt.
It's nearly always been this way in a nation addicted to war
and a culture of violence that's as commonplace at home as in
foreign conflicts. It's in our DNA, our schools and
reinforced through the media with seductive symbols and
slogans glorifying wars for peace, their warriors, and
righteousness of waging them. They're packaged as liberating
ones, promoting democracy, and spreading the benefits of
western civilization.
We're taught our essential goodness and what Edward Herman
calls our status as an "indispensable state" that lets us do
what no other nation may - wage perpetual wars for an elusive
peace in the name of freedom and justice for all we preach
but don't practice. We manipulate false notions of
exceptionalism and moral superiority giving us the right to
spread our ways to others while hiding our darker imperial
side delivered through the barrel of a gun. It shames the
notion of a "government of the people, by the people, for the
people."
Expansionism
and Militarism: An American Tradition
Expansionism
has always been our way and militarism our method. It's been
since winning the West meant taking it from the millions
there thousands of years earlier. No matter. "Manifest
Destiny" meant a divine right for settlers only to enjoy the
nation's "spacious skies....amber waves of grain....and
purple mountain majesties....from sea to shining sea." Others
already there had to go, and mass slaughter was the method.
Our forefathers loathed Native Indians, and George Washington
showed it in his language. He called them "red savages,"
compared them to wolves and "beasts of prey," and aimed to
exterminate the Onieda people who aided him in his darkest
hours at Valley Forge. He also dispatched General John
Sullivan and 5000 troops against the noncombatant Onondaga
people with orders to destroy their villages, homes, fields,
food supplies, cattle herds, orchards and then annihilate
them and seize their land.
Hitler modeled his "Final Solution" on the "American
Holocaust." He targeted Untermenschen (subhumans) and Slavs
he called "redskins." We know what happened. Raphael Lemkin
called it "genocide" as he first defined it in 1944 to mean:
"the destruction of a nation or of an ethnic group" that
corresponds to other terms like "tyrannicide, homocide,
infanticide, etc." Genocide "does not necessarily mean
the....destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by
mass killings....It is intended....to signify a coordinated
plan (to destroy the) the essential foundations of the life
of national groups" with intent to destroy them. Genocidal
plans involve the disintegration of....political and social
institutions, culture, language, national feelings,
religion....economic existence, personal security, liberty,
health, dignity, and" human lives.
Throughout our history, it's been our way, and since 1990,
three US Presidents waged genocidal war in Iraq to erase the
"cradle of civilization" and remake it in our own image. Two
and a half million are dead and counting from it, the country
is plagued by out-of-control violence, one-third of its
people need emergency aid, millions go hungry, and a once
prosperous nation is now a surreal lawless occupied wasteland
with few or no essential services like electricity, clean
water, medical care, fuel and most everything else needed for
sustenance and survival. That's the ugly face of "genocide"
in real time.
Native peoples were its earlier victim. Puritans saw them as
"brutes, devils" and "devil-worshippers" in a godless,
howling wilderness filled with evil spirits and "dangerous
wild beasts." They were targeted for removal as settlers
moved west. They cleansed the land through violence,
bloodletting and 40 Native Indian wars from 1622 - 1900 to
win the West, North and South. Wars became our national
pastime, and we've waged them like sport ever since in an
endless unbroken cycle.
We fought four imperial ones as well from 1689 to 1763 with
England, France, Spain and Holland. Throughout the period,
numerous settler outbreaks and insurrections arose that were
also put down along with dozens of riots. Then there were the
major wars we know by name. First was the American War of
Independence (or Revolutionary War) from 1775 - 83. A
minority of colonists supported it, little changed, and the
outcome repackaged Crown rule under new management.
The so-called War of 1812 (to early 1815) was more about
American expansionism than Brits impressing our seamen.
"Manifest Destiny" then became a catch phrase when Jacksonian
Democrats proclaimed it in 1845 as the nation's "destiny" for
all the land "from sea to shining sea." It was packaged as a
noble mission, propagated as ruling orthodoxy, and used to
justify other acquisitions.
We then headed south of the border from 1846 - 1848 in what
Mexicans called "la invasion estadounidense" that easily
self-translates as the US invasion. It was our Mexican War
that began after the annexation of Texas and ended with the
Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. It forced Mexico to cede half
its country to avoid losing it all in what's now Texas,
California, Arizona, New Mexico, Nevada, and parts of Wyoming
and Utah. The country is still cursed the way former Mexican
dictator, Porfirio Diaz, meant when he said: "Poor Mexico, so
far from God, and so close to the United States." Today that
holds for all nations with a rogue superpower on the march
and liberty and justice nowhere in sight.
Nor was it earlier when wars had similar aims as now with one
exception. The Civil War from 1861 - 1865 was sort of a
family squabble. Some squabble. Before it ended, it was our
bloodiest ever. Three million were in it and over 600,000
died at a time the total population was 31 million, including
4 million slaves. That was double the battle deaths from WW
II when 12 million fought from a population of 132 million,
and if the same proportionate number had perished it would
have been around 2.5 million.
Next came the Spanish-American War against Spain. In 1897,
Theodore Roosevelt (as Assistant Secretary of the Navy and
later 1906 Nobel Peace Prize laureate) wrote a friend...."I
should welcome almost any war, for I think this country needs
one," and the next year it began. We won, they lost and
America had its coming out party on a world stage. A half
century later, we control much of it, want the rest, and
plan, as a birthright, to take it as disdainfully as our
forefathers.
The war with Spain was quick and little more than a skirmish
for three and a half months. It was our first offshore
imperial foray netting us control of Cuba as a de facto
colony for starters. Following the war, Congress passed the
Platt Amendment in 1901. It granted us jurisdictional right
to intervene freely in Cuban affairs and ceded Guantanamo Bay
(as a coaling or naval station only) to the US in perpetuity
(provided annual rent is paid) unless later terminated by
mutual consent of both countries. It was just the beginning.
We also took the Philippines (slaughtering 200,000 of its
people), Hawaii, Haiti, Guam, Puerto Rico, the Dominican
Republic, Samoa, assorted other territories later and the
Canal Zone from Colombia to fulfill Theodore Roosevelt's
dream to link the Atlantic and Pacific with a canal across
its isthmus.
Woodrow Wilson was reelected in 1916 on a campaign promise:
"He Kept Us Out of War." He lied. He wanted war and
established the Committee on Public Information under George
Creel in 1917 to get it. It turned a pacifist nation into
raging German-haters, America declared war in April, 1917 and
was in it until it ended in November, 1918. This writer's dad
fought in France and returned unharmed. The US empire was on
a roll.
Today, mainstream historians perceive Wilson as a liberal
Democrat. He was quite opposite, and his imperial record
alone proves it. He occupied Haiti in 1915 beginning 20
hellish years for its people until Franklin Roosevelt
withdraw US forces in 1934. He sent US troops to Nicaragua,
the Dominican Republic, and in 1914 invaded Mexico, occupying
its main seaport city of Veracruz. It was a dress rehearsal
for WW I and might have become a full-scale war had Wilson
not pulled US forces out ahead of the greater conflict he
aimed for in Europe.
The defining event of the 20th century was WW II from which
the US emerged the only dominant nation left standing. We
became the world's unchallengeable superpower as though we
planned it that way, which we did. From it emerged our
"imperial grand strategy" under the Truman Doctrine as well
as a plan for US global military and economic dominance. The
Cold War began with "containment" the policy. The US empire
was on a roll and would never look back.
US Imperialism Post-WW II
When the Cold War ended in 1991, George HW Bush's Defense
Secretary Dick Cheney and undersecretary Paul Wolfowitz were
tasked to shape a new strategy that emerged in 1992 as the
Defense Planning Guidance or Wolfowitz Doctrine. It was so
extreme, it was kept under wraps, but not for long. It was
leaked to the New York Times causing uproar enough for the
elder Bush to shelve it until the neoconservative think tank
Project for a New American Century (PNAC) revived it in a
document called "Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategies,
Forces and Resources for a New Century." It was an imperial
plan for global dominance for well into the future to be
enforced with unchallengeable military power. It became the
blueprint for the "war on terror" and all the hot ones
planned to wage it.
WW II was more a beginning than an end to war. The US kept
Korea and Vietnam divided and targeted independent-minded
leaders. It was part of our imperial designs on East Asia
that included containing Soviet Russia as well as China. It
led us to incite civil wars in Korea and Vietnam expecting
both times to prevail but were stalemated in one and lost the
other.
North Korea's Fatherland Liberation War began June 25, 1950
when the DPRK retaliated in force following months of US
influenced Republic of Korean (ROK) provocations. It ended in
an uneasy cease-fire July 27, 1953 and is still unresolved to
this day. The North and South are technically at war, the US
refuses to negotiate an honorable peace, and 57 years later
37,000 American forces are in the South with no intention to
leave.
Korea taught us nothing. Vietnam was next, and now we're
embroiled in Iraq and Afghanistan with a potentially
disastrous war looming against Iran. It proves Ben Franklin
right that "The definition of insanity is doing the same
thing over and over, expecting different results."
Adventurism in Vietnam began under Truman and Eisenhower
supporting France. It expanded full-blown under Lyndon
Johnson and Richard Nixon before ending in a humiliating
final pullout from the US Saigon Embassy rooftop April 30,
1975.
The 1980s brought more conflict with Ronald Reagan's war
against "international terrorism." He invaded tiny Grenada in
1983 against a left-leaning regime for a pro-western one we
installed. Scorched earth proxy wars then upped the stakes in
Central America, Afghanistan, Africa and the Middle East. We
tread lightly nowhere, and these conflicts left hundreds of
thousands dead and immiserated in the name of democracy,
humanitarian intervention, and the benefits of western
civilization by our method of choice - gun barrels blazing.
GHW Bush then followed with Panama his prey. He deposed its
leader, then targeted Saddam for the only crime that mattered
- disobeying the lord and master of the universe and its
rules of imperial management, especially Rule No. 1: We're
boss, and what we say goes.
The Gulf war followed with 12 crushing years of sanctions its
legacy. They left 1.5 million Iraqis dead and the living
devastated. The current cycle of permanent wars began
post-9/11 in October, 2001. First came the Taliban with Iraq
ahead as the prime target of choice. It's huge oil reserves
made it the most sought after real estate on earth with a
plan to seize them simple at its core - a bold new experiment
to erase a nation and create a new one by invasion,
occupation and reconstruction for pillage. It would transform
Iraq into a fully privatized free market paradise with blank
check public funding for profit but none for Iraqis for
essential needs, a sustainable economy or critical local
infrastructure.
It's been a disaster with the toll on Iraqis horrific - an
inferno of uncontrolled violence throughout the country with
new British O.R.B. independent polling data estimating 1.2
million Iraqi deaths since March, 2003 on top of the 1.5
million others since 1990. The war is now longer in duration
than WWs I or II and will likely exceed the latter one in
inflation-adjusted cost before it ends. It's not in sight
thanks to a complicit Democrat-led Congress that's long on
theater but short on action it can take but won't. Allied
with the administration, it flaunts public demands to end the
war, bring home the troops, and will shortly accede to
another Bush supplemental request for billions more in
funding.
Public sentiment might be stronger if Jeff Nygaard's June,
2007 Z Magazine article titled "The Secret Air Wars in Iraq
and Afghanistan" got wider play, so here's hoping this
article gives it some. He explained US Central Command Air
Forces (CENTAF) posts its daily "airpower summaries" online
that makes for horrifying reading "aside (from) the blatant
propaganda." Nygaard explained "relentless" air attacks
against Iran and Afghanistan have gone on for years - on
average 75 - 100 each day against both countries. It's a huge
unreported story in the dominant media. The death toll is
unknown, he says, "but a reasonable estimate" is between
100,000 - 150,000 in Iraq alone, and it's anyone's guess in
Afghanistan. That's on top of all other war-related deaths
estimated in both countries.
Further, these attacks exclude "guided missiles and unguided
rockets fired....cannon rounds (and) munitions used by some
Marine Corps and other 'coalition' aircraft or any of the
Army's helicopter gunships (plus) munitions used by the armed
helicopters of the many 'private (mercenary hired gun)
security contractors' flying their own missions in Iraq." If
the true human toll were known, it might be shockingly above
the most gruesome current estimates and growing daily.
The public has a right to know this, and Congress is
obligated to find out, tell them, cut off all funding and end
two illegal wars of aggression. Instead, Democrats and
Republicans back a further administration aggression against
Iran in spite of silenced high level opposition to it. It may
come from two large nuclear-armed US carrier strike groups
conducting provocative exercises near Iranian waters in the
Persian Gulf and Eastern Medditerranean.
Washington makes no secret it wants regime change in Iran,
and time is running out for the Bush administration to get
it. For months, covert black operations have been ongoing
inside the country. It's aimed to incite internal ethnic and
political opposition, and CIA operatives have also been
sending Baluchi tribal warriors from neighboring Pakistan on
terror raids into neighboring Iranian areas. Now 350 British
forces have been provocatively sent from Basra to the
volatile Iranian border, and the Pentagon announced it's
building a US base and fortified checkpoints nearby as well.
General Petraeus also implied to Congress he'll act inside
Iranian territory to stop its "proxy war" against US Iraqi
forces. In the meantime, Iran claims Washington backs
Israeli-trained Kurdish Party for Free Life (PJAK) as well as
Arab, Azeri and Baluchi incursions inside their territory to
undermine its leadership, provoke a response, and provide
cover for a US attack.
Without a touch of irony, US Ambassador Ryan Crocker and
Iranian Ambassador Hassan Kazemi Qumi held four hours of
face-to-face talks in Baghdad in May that was the first
official bilateral meeting between the countries in almost
three decades. It amounted to nothing more than the usual US
duplicity that pointed to what's now happening and likely to
escalate. Earlier, George Bush demanded and will soon get
harsher US-imposed sanctions through the Iran
Counter-Proliferation Act of 2007 that's designed to strangle
the country economically. He earlier signed off on a
commitment of economic destabilization through media-driven
propaganda, now heightened, as well as manipulation of Iran's
currency and international transactions. That, in turn, just
prompted Tehran in response to demand foreign energy
companies do business in euros and yen.
So far, it's anyone's guess what's ahead with war a real
possibility. The Bush administration is pounding Iran with
menacing claims of meddling in Iraq and covertly advancing a
nuclear weapons program despite having no proof of either.
Whatever's planned could be devastating to the region (and
world economy if oil shipments are disrupted), and the kinds
of options being considered may cause dire unintended
consequences if the worst of them involving nuclear weapons
are used.
Bill Clinton's 1990s Balkan wars took their toll earlier at a
time most people shamefully bought the US-led NATO propaganda
of a good war against a demonized enemy and a
well-intentioned intervention to remove him. It divided and
destroyed a country under the guise of humanitarian
intervention that provided cover for naked imperialism. Most
observers on the left got it wrong and still don't know NATO
(meaning the US) committed illegal aggression to expand into
Central and Eastern Europe.
The Balkan wars kept predatory capitalism on a roll for more
new markets, resources and cheap exploitable labor by the
same ugly methods of choice - wars, subversion or coercion
with "uncooperative" leaders like Slobadon Milosevic playing
fall guy. He ended up abducted to the Hague and hung out to
dry by the ICTY US-run kangaroo court that silenced him (like
Saddam in Baghdad) so his secrets went to the grave with him.
So much for democracy in a nation stained by a
near-unblemished record of illegal aggression throughout its
history and in every post-WW II conflict fought. The only
exception was the so-called 1991 Gulf war. It was authorized,
as required, by the Security Council but only through bribes
and coercion. The US public opposed it until a lot of Kuwaiti
government PR massaging turned it around, and the rest is
history.
The Harmful Effects of Imperialism at Home
The price at home has been high as well with democracy here
just as fake as wherever we leave our imperial footprint.
Ordinary Americans are the losers. Repressive laws and
crumbling social services are their reward for patriotism.
Then there's the military and what's diverted to fund it.
Annual Pentagon budgets are soaring with the FY 2008 DOD one
calling for an astonishing $648.8 billion plus an additional
$147.5 billion war supplemental and around $50 billion or
more now requested. The final total will likely top out over
$850 billion with the usual pork factored in and Congress
ready to authorize whatever more is needed.
Then come the 16 US spy agencies and their secret
off-the-books budgets. CIA, NSA and the others get tens of
billions more without accountability. The CIA is an
especially out-of-control, rogue agency accountable only to
the President. Post-WW II, it began intervening throughout
the world covertly and overtly. No dirty trick is off the
table, and CIA invented their fair share of them. It uses
them spying, fomenting and supporting wars, deposing foreign
heads of state, and now they're in play on US soil against
American citizens. Noted academic and administration critic,
Chalmers Johnson, calls the agency "the president's private
army" serving in the same capacity as imperial Rome's
praetorian guard.
The agency is secret and lawless, unaccountable to the
public, Congress or the courts with intelligence gathering a
sideline operation at most. Since it was created in 1947, but
especially now, CIA has an appalling record of toppling
democratically elected governments, assassinating foreign
heads of state and other key officials, propping up friendly
dictators, and now snatching targeted individuals for
"extraordinary rendition" to secret torture-prison hellholes
from which many won't emerge or ever get justice.
It takes lots of cover-up and myth-building to create the
illusion America wants peace, is "beautiful," and respects
the law and rights of people everywhere. The truth is quite
opposite abroad and at home where essential needs go unmet
and violence is a way of life.
It recently showed up in the newly launched Global Peace
Index's (GPI) ranking of 121 nations. It was prepared by the
Economist Intelligence Unit, an international panel of peace
experts from peace institutes and think tanks, and the Centre
for Peace and Conflict Studies at the University of Sydney,
Australia. It aims to "highlight the relationship between
Global Peace and Sustainability (stressing) unless we can
achieve" a peaceful world, humanity's major challenges won't
be solved. GPI ranked nations by their relative internal and
external "peacefulness" using 24 indicators. They include
its:
--
military expenditures as a percent of GDP and number of armed
service personnel per 100,000 population;
-- number of external and internal wars including the
estimated number of deaths from them externally and
internally;
-- relations with other countries;
-- respect for human rights;
-- potential for terrorist acts;
-- number of homicides per 100,000 population including
infanticide;
-- level of violent crime;
-- aggregate number of heavy weapons per 100,000 population
and ease of access to small arms and light weapons;
-- number of jailed population per 100,000 population; and
-- number of internal security officers and police per
100,000 population.
The US was a shocking 96th in the overall rankings - to the
naive and innocent, that is. Norway, New Zealand and Denmark
scored best in that order while Iraq ranked lowest followed
by Sudan and Israel, that should be a wake-up call for its
supporters.
Violence
in America - A Way of Life at Home and Abroad
This article began with a snapshot account of our violent
history and culture. So much is in our communities and homes
that it's easy selling foreign wars to people used to
settling disputes confrontationally, not calmly. It may start
with bloody noses in school yards or playgrounds. It's then
made to seem commonplace in films and on prime time TV where
assaults, violent crime, murder and even torture are everyday
forms of entertainment. Then there's sports. The most popular
ones involve contact, often brutal, with one played on ice
once described as a fight with occasional hockey breaking
out.
Television features sports of all kinds, the more violent the
better. Studies show nearly every home has at least one TV
set, and 54% of children have their own in their bedrooms.
They spend 28 hours a week on average watching, double the
time spent in school, so they learn more about life through
the media than anywhere else. Before age 18, the average
American child sees 200,000 acts of violence on TV including
16,000 murders, and studies show homicide rates doubled 10 -
15 years after television was introduced.
They also link the following potential adverse effects to
excessive media exposure:
--
increased violent behavior;
-- impaired school performance;
-- increased sexual activity and use of tobacco and alcohol;
and
-- decreased family communication among other negative
influences unrelated to violence.
A National Television Violence Study showed two-thirds of
children's programming had violence, three-fourths of it went
unpunished, and most often victims weren't shown experiencing
pain. Even more disturbing, the study identified nearly half
the violence children see is in TV cartoons. They're most
often portrayed in humor with victims hardly ever
experiencing long-term consequences. There's more:
-- Unsurprisingly, it's no different on the big screen as
film studios produce entertainment for theater viewing and at
home.
-- There's a great, but unmeasurable, amount of different
types of violence online, including pedophile cyber-seduction
on unsuspecting, vulnerable children leading to sexual
assaults.
-- Studies show violent video games like Doom, Wolfenstein 3D
and Mortal Kombat can increase aggressive thoughts, beliefs
and behavior both in laboratory settings and real life.
They're even worse than TV or films because they're
interactive and engrossing. They get players to identify with
aggressors since they act like them while playing. These
games teach violence. Many young people play them often and
parents allow it. It's no wonder they become aggressive and
continue the same behavior later as adults for real.
-- Music also teaches violence. The Parents Music Resource
Center reports teenagers hear an estimated 10,500 hours of
rock music between grades 7 and 12 alone or nearly as much
time as they spend in school. Entertainment Monitor reported
three-fourths of popular CDs sold in 1995 included profanity
or lyrics about drugs, violence and sex with some popular rap
artists' music glorifying guns, rape and murder.
With this as backdrop after 500 years of belligerency, it's
no wonder violence in the country and attitudes toward it are
out of control. The record includes harsh private and
government homeland crackdowns against dissidents, labor,
minorities, street protesters, rioters, ethnic or religious
groups and others plus all the one-on-one confrontations as
well. For centuries, violence was monstrous against our
Native peoples and nearly exterminated them all. It was used
against black slaves as well with whippings, other beatings,
rapes, mutilations, forced family separations and even
amputations as punishment for runaways. Post-slavery, the
pattern continued, mostly in the South, under forced Jim Crow
segregation that enforced white supremacy over blacks that
played out violently for those "stepping out of line."
A snapshot of recent data on violent crimes provides more
evidence. It comes from the Department of Justice (DOJ),
other sources, and shows the following:
-- 960,000 violent acts against a current or former spouse,
boyfriend or girlfriend and up to three million women
physically abused by their husband, male partner or boyfriend
annually;
-- in 2001, more than half a million American women (588,490)
were victims of nonfatal violence committed by an intimate
partner;
-- intimate violence is mainly a crime against women
accounting for 85% of these incidences;
-- women are up to eight times more likely than men to be
victimized by an intimate partner;
-- in 2001, 20% of violent crimes against women were by
intimate partners;
-- up to 324,000 women experience intimate partner violence
during pregnancy;
-- women of all races are about equally vulnerable to
intimate partner violence;
-- women are up to 14 times more likely than men to report
suffering severe physical assaults from an intimate partner;
-- 20% of female high school students report being physically
and/or sexually abused by a dating partner and 40% of 14 - 17
year old girls report knowing someone their age struck or
beaten by a boyfriend;
-- in a national survey of 6000 American families, 50% of the
men who frequently assaulted their wives also abused their
children;
-- studies show up to 10 million children witness some form
of domestic violence annually;
-- over half a million women report being stalked annually by
an intimate partner while 80% stalked by former husbands are
physically assaulted and 30% sexually assaulted by that
partner;
-- the FBI divides violent crime into four categories:
"murder and nonnegligent manslaughter, forcible rape,
robbery, and aggravated assault." It uses the International
Association of Chiefs of Police Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR)
Program's definition of violent crime as involving force or
threat of force. The annual data show these crimes topped one
million in 1975 and from the mid-1980s ranged from around 1.5
- 1.9 million annually;
-- since 1975, annual violent crimes of murder and reported
rape ranged from around 100,000 - 130,000;
-- Every year over the past century, 10% or more of all
crimes committed were violent ones; and
-- More Americans killed other Americans at home than the
total death toll from all foreign wars in our history
combined.
Violence, of course, becomes ingrained in the culture. It
leads to crackdowns against society's least "worthy" victims
of state-sponsored repression. It made America the
incarceration capital of the world with over 2.2 million in
our homeland "gulag" prison system today, a greater number
than in China with four times our population and a history of
governments not known for gentleness toward those breaking
its rules. Here 1000 new inmates weekly join others locked in
cages, most for non-violent offenses. They're brutalized by
prison guards and other inmates while there and become more
likely to exact revenge on release for society's unjust
treatment. Many, in fact, do and end up back in prison for
longer sentences.
This kind of information and our national predilection for
violence isn't taught in schools or explained in the media.
Instead we accept the illusion of "American exceptionalism,"
moral superiority, and innate goodness in a nation chosen by
the Almighy to lead the world. That's provided it's by rules
made in Washington with people everywhere told accept them,
or else. Going to war, we're told, is a last resort choice
and one never taken lightly. It's to liberate the oppressed,
bring democracy when we arrive, and target "national
security" threats too great to ignore. It takes powerful
propaganda persuasion convincing people to accept this, but
it's made easier if they're already predisposed to violence
and receptive to more of it.
Five centuries at home and abroad add up to potent
conditioning, but the dangers were less threatening earlier
than now. Today's super-weapons make older ones look like
toys. They leave no margin of error, and if we slip up we'll
endanger what Noam Chomsky calls "biology's only experiment
with higher intelligence." Unless we confront the threat to
our survival from foreign wars and a violent culture
accustomed to them, we face what Albert Einstein and
philosopher Bertrand Russell warned 50 years ago saying:
"Shall we put an end to the human race, or shall mankind
renounce war" and a culture of violence and live in peace
because no other way is possible.
Also, visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and
listen to The Steve Lendman News and Information Hour on
TheMicroEffect.com Saturdays at noon US central time.
FAIR
USE NOTICE: This site may contain copyrighted material, the
use of which has not been specifically authorized by the
copyright owner. This website distributes this material
without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information for research and
educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use
of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C
§ 107.
NOTE TO AUTHORS: If you are the author or owner of an article
or video that I have made available through THEINFOVAULT.NET
and you do not wish to have your article or video posted on
theinfovault, please contact me and I will remove the
item.